U.S.carbon cloth economic
growth sped up to an annual rate of 2.5 percent in the first quarter of
this year, the Commerce Department said Friday. It was an acceleration
from the prior quarter, but not as much as expected, raising concerns
that the World's largest economy may lose steam through spring and
summer for another year.The real gross domestic product (GDP), a measure
of all goods and services produced in the country,Cursher expanded
faster from January to March than the final three months of 2012, but
the pace was slower than the 3 percent forecasters had expected.
The
gains mainly came from stronger consumer spending and increased
stockpiling by businesses. The pick-up was also propelled by an upturn
in exports and a smaller decrease in federal government spending, Antique faucetsaccording
to the report.On the bright side, consumer spending, which makes up
roughly two-thirds of U.S. economic activity, increased by 3.2 percent.
It advanced by the fastest pace since the final quarter of 2010 despite
the lapse of the payroll tax credit at the beginning of this year.The
change in business inventories contributed 1.03 percentage points to the
change in real GDP after subtracting 1.52 percentage points from the
fourth-quarter change.However, businesses slowed the pace of investment
as growth of nonresidential fixed investment moderated to just 2.1
percent last quarter after a strong gain of 13.2 percent in the final
quarter of last year.
Real
federal government consumption expenditures and investment decreased
8.4 percent in the first quarter, compared with a decrease of 14.8
percent in the fourth. It subtracted more than half percentage point
from the GDP growth.Meanwhile, exports was outpaced by imports,
resulting a trade deficit that cut off half a percentage point from
growth rate."There's good news and bad news buried in the detail. The
good is that consumers seem interested in spending again. We'll see
whether that holds up over coming months. The bad is that firms aren't
so optimistic, and investment was lackluster," said Justin Wolfers,
senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
The
smaller-than-expected increase in GDP, along with a train of
disappointing economic news, is likely to fuel the concerns that current
trend will not continue in the months ahead.In March,garage equipments the
month when the 85-billion-dollar federal sequester cuts went into
affect, job growth dramatically slowed, retail sales dropped and
manufacturing sector showed signs of weakness. Some analysts cited these
as evidences that the U.S. economy may have slowed at the end of the
first quarter."The 'advance' estimate of first quarter GDP growth
encompasses the first month after sequestration began on March 1. It is
likely that the contraction in federal defense and non-defense spending,
at least in part, reflects the onset of sequestration," Alan Krueger,
chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said Friday in
a statement.
"These
arbitrary and unnecessary cuts to government services will be a
headwind in the months to come, and will cut key investments in the
nation's future competitiveness. The Congressional Budget Office has
estimated that the sequester will reduce GDP growth by 0.6 percentage
point for the year," he added.Some argued that the first-quarter
acceleration was possibly because of the unusually weak performance at
the end of 2012, when growth was dragged down by smaller restocking of
businesses and big decline in government spending."The bigger picture is
that we have a fledgling recovery which needs help,Antique tubs but
isn't getting it. Fiscal policy is set as a drag on growth, and
monetary policy delivering below-target inflation," said wolfers.This
summer, the Commerce Department will release its benchmark revisions for
the calculation of GDP. Expenditures on research and development
(R&D), which currently are not recorded as final expenditures, will
be recognized as fixed investment. Creative works, including
entertainment, literary, and other artistic originals, are also expected
to add billions of dollars to the overall size of the U.S. economy but
without changing the underlying trend of the growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment